
As the saying goes, a chain is only as strong as?its weakest link. This adage rings true in many?situations. In regard to risk, for example, there are?countless points at which various individuals might?contribute to the overall strength of an organization?s?management of risk. The antithesis of the ?it?s-not-my-job? mentality, this mindset is all about a corporate?consciousness of risk, people stepping up and?assuming responsibility, and those at the top doing?everything possible to ensure personal and collective?accountability throughout the enterprise.
Who?s responsible for risk?
Through the years, guidance on risk management?has been issued by a variety of organizations around?the world such as the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations?of the Treadway Commission (COSO);?the International Organization for Standardization?(ISO); the Information Systems Audit and Control?Association (ISACA); the Risk Management Society?(RIMS); and the Federation of European Risk?Management Associations (FERMA).
Risk management?principles have evolved to help organizations?build strong risk management programs. For?example, in 2004 COSO published Enterprise Risk?Management?Integrated Framework. This well known?framework established common definitions, provided?direction for enhancing risk management, and set?criteria for evaluating whether a risk management?program is effective.
In addition to building a risk management program?around a framework like COSO?s, many thought?leaders believe that risk management, at its best, is?a shared philosophy with shared responsibility. Over?the years, Tone at the Top frequently has pointed out?that controls are everybody?s business. Likewise, risk?management is everybody?s responsibility.
As line management considers the various decisions?they face daily, risk should be on their radar?and?the controls, policies, and procedures that would?minimize the likelihood of those risks materializing. Likewise?at the top of the organization, boards and executive?management must collaborate for risk management as?they develop strategies. There is an opportunity for organizations?to embed this process into their management?culture. At the end of the day, the board and CEO are?ultimately responsible for risk management. But it?s only?truly possible through a collective effort.
Functional Collaboration
So if, ideally, risk management is everybody?s responsibility?at every level of the organization and if all functions?are attuned to its importance and its mandate, how can?they work together for the greater good? What can specific?areas do to coordinate their work with the efforts of?others from a risk perspective?
Recently, The Institute of Internal Auditors (IIA) and?RIMS released a joint report on the value garnered when?the internal auditors and risk managers collaborate on?risk management efforts. The report reflects the view of?The IIA and RIMS that effective collaboration and open?dialogue result in a more robust view of the entire risk?portfolio.
?Risk managers and internal auditors have many of the?same stakeholders ? boards and executive management?? and these stakeholders want to maximize resources?while effectively managing risk,? IIA Vice President of?North American Services Hal Garyn, CIA, says in the?report. ?Having these vital risk management and assessment?functions collaborate, speak the same language,?and leverage one another?s perspectives on the business?is crucial.?
Carol Fox, RIMS director of strategic and enterprise risk?practice, agrees. ?Risk management and internal audit?roles are complementary. An overarching common goal is?to position organizations for successful achievement of?their respective missions and business objectives,? Fox?says in the report. ?The two disciplines are more effective?working together than separately, especially when?there is a common understanding of each other?s roles.?For example, as the internal auditors offer assurance as to?management?s effectiveness regarding strategic risks, the?risk management function provides the techniques and?methods for management to be most effective.?
The report, ?Risk Management and Internal Audit:?Forging a Collaborative Alliance,? includes case studies?of differing approaches at four risk-savvy organizations:?Cisco Systems, Hospital Corporation of America (HCA),?TD Ameritrade, and Whirlpool Corporation.
Common and effective collaborative practices that?emerged during the case studies include:
- Linking the audit plan and the enterprise risk?assessment, and sharing other work products to?provide assurance that critical risks are being effectively?identified.
- Sharing available resources wherever and whenever?possible to allow for efficient use of scarce resources,?such as finances, staffing, and time.
- Cross leveraging each function?s respective competencies,?roles, and responsibilities to provide communication?depth and consistency, especially at the?board and management levels.
- Assessing and monitoring strategic risks to allow for?deeper understanding and focused action on the?most significant risks.
According to the study, ERM results shared with internal?audit can be factored into the audit plan. Also, when?the internal auditors discuss their risk-based audit plan?with the risk management team, valuable insights from?different perspectives on organizational governance?and enterprise oversight occur. These approaches help?eliminate redundancies in identifying critical risks to the?organization, produce a common and aligned view of the?organization?s risk profile, and help instill a consistent?risk management vocabulary.
?In addition to integrating ERM risk considerations?into our annual risk assessment process, an improvement?we?ve introduced over the last few years is to show?the linkage between the audits on our audit plan to the?related primary ERM category. This linkage highlights in?a tangible way the integration between the audit and risk?management functions,? Whirlpool?s Irene Corbe says?in the report. Corbe serves as vice president of internal?audit at Whirlpool.
Open communication, even though the channels may?vary, is a valuable component of all of the case studies.?Some of the organizations studied conduct regularly?scheduled in-person meetings. Others correspond in?writing, some communicate by telephone, and most use?multiple methods to exchange ideas and information.
Effective risk management requires accountability, as?Cisco Systems Vice President of Governance, Risk, and?Controls Philip Roush points out in the report. ?If the?responsible risk owner has not taken action on risks that?need addressing,? Roush says, ?the ERM and internal?audit teams inquire why this is the case and highlight the?status to senior management and the audit committee as?appropriate.?
Achieving optimal risk management is not an overnight?occurrence, as HCA Senior Vice President, Internal?Audit and Risk Management Services Joe Steakley?explains. His team surveys CEOs, COOs, CFOs, and?chief nursing officers at approximately 170 hospitals to?determine the top-ranked risks. All participants are asked?identical questions. The first few years HCA conducted?its risk-ranking exercise, it was clear that there wasn?t a?common understanding of the risks. Hospital personnel?were not ranking or identifying the risks the same as?corporate management and the board.
Now ? a decade?into the process ? there is a deeper understanding, a?broader awareness, and the same risks rise to the surface?in most interviews. ?The last several years the responses?have been very well aligned,? Steakley says. ?Last year, in?fact, the board was even aligned with what the hospital?staffs were saying. I believe this is a real testament to the?maturity of our process.?
**********
This article originally appeared in?The Institute of Internal Auditors??Tone at the Top?June 2012 newsletter. With more than 170,000 members in 165 countries, The Institute of Internal Auditors is internationally recognized as the global voice and standard-setting body for the internal audit profession.
Tone at the Top?provides executive management, boards of directors, and audit committees with concise, leading-edge information on issues such as ethics, internal control, governance, and the changing role of internal auditing.
mirror mirror robyn texas relays meniscus the colony kids choice awards ncaa final four 2012
No comments:
Post a Comment
Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.